Comprehensive meta analysis
- #Comprehensive meta analysis full#
- #Comprehensive meta analysis software#
- #Comprehensive meta analysis free#
We took an unconventional approach and created a program that uses Excel as a calculation and programming platform.
#Comprehensive meta analysis software#
We specifically aimed at students and researchers who are new to meta-analysis, with important parts of the development oriented towards creating internal interactive tutoring tools and designing features that would facilitate usage of the software as a companion to existing books on meta-analysis.
#Comprehensive meta analysis free#
We set out to create and validate an easy-to-use and comprehensive meta-analysis package that would be simple enough programming-wise to remain available as a free download. Unfortunately, it can take a substantial amount of time to get acquainted with some of these programs and most contain little or no interactive educational material. Consequently, the number of software packages that can perform meta-analysis has increased over the years. So far, meta-analysis has been particularly useful in evaluating and comparing therapies and in assessing causes of disease. Further, social anxiety treatment had moderate to large effects on depression and quality of life.Meta-analysis has become a well-known method for synthesis of quantitative data from previously conducted research in applied health sciences. Head-to-head comparisons, which included trials comparing active treatments, indicated no differences between psychotherapy, medication, and the combination of the two. Medication class and specific drug type were significant moderators for pharmacotherapy studies comparing an active treatment to a control condition. In psychotherapy trials, self-exposure (as compared to all other types of CBT) and psychotherapist training were significant moderators, whereas variables corresponding to treatment modality and delivery were not. Treatment type was no longer a significant moderator once control condition was accounted for.
#Comprehensive meta analysis full#
Publication type, inclusion/exclusion criteria related to depression and substance abuse/dependence, and full sample comorbidity with another disorder were not. mixed sample of generalized and specific social anxiety disorder) and type of inclusion/exclusion criteria related to other anxiety disorders were significant moderators. completer), funding source, type of screening interview, type of treatment clinic (academic or private), version of diagnostic criteria, type of social anxiety sample (generalized social anxiety disorder only vs. Examination of potential study characteristic moderators indicated that treatment type (CBT, medication, combination), analysis type (intent-to-treat vs. Significant heterogeneity among treatment effects was evident, largely accounted for by true variation between effects, versus standard error. We found a moderate to large effect size for all active treatments compared to control conditions. For the present study, a comprehensive literature search produced 93 publications featuring 94 controlled trials (N = 11,503), which were included in the final analyses. Though there have been numerous trials in the past decade, no meta-analysis examining both psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for social anxiety disorder has been published since 2001. A number of meta-analyses have been conducted since 1995 examining the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and/or pharmacotherapy for social anxiety disorder.
Over the past several decades, psychotherapeutic, specifically cognitive behavioral, and pharmacologic approaches have been found efficacious for social anxiety disorder.
Abstract Social anxiety disorder is the fourth most prevalent mental disorder in the US.